In this chapter we will integrate the Input with the Load Balancer (henceforth LB). The first, as we have just seen in the previous chapter, was presented as an entity that lives within the Kubernetes cluster and comes in the form of a Pod. The second, presented a few pages ago, is an entity that lives outside the cluster and is hosted by the Cloud Provider in use (OpenStack in our case). We strongly recommend a review of these two objects before proceeding with the reading, consulting the pages linked above or through other sources. 

We will then explain how to create a connection point between these two components. The joining point consists of a file, containing the access credentials (username, password) and the coordinates (projectID, region) of the OpenStack tenant that we want to link. The purpose, in fact, is to automatically create the LB and its components (Listener, Pool, Policy, etc.), starting from the Kubernetes cluster. Finally, we point out that this page is based on a GitHub guide, which you can reach from here.

Requirements

Some premises are needed before starting the deployment:

  • Communication between octavia-ingress-controller and Octavia is required, since the implementation relies on LB management by OpenStack Octavia service.
  • Octavia stable/queens (v. 2.1.2) or higher version is required.
  • OpenStack Key Manager (Barbican) service is required for TLS Ingress, otherwise Ingress creation will fail. Here, however, we will not use the TLS protocol.
  • Make sure your Kubernetes cluster is reporting at least version 1.19 or higher, to avoid API incompatibility issues.

Let's create and move inside the following folder, which will encapsulate the files we will use in this guide. We will create the various components under the kube-system namespace, but you are free to use another one, of course.

Create directory
$ mkdir -p /etc/kubernetes/octavia-ingress-controller
$ cd /etc/kubernetes/octavia-ingress-controller

To set a default namespace, avoiding entering it in the CLI every time, use the following command

Set default namespace
$ kubectl config set-context --current --namespace=<namespace>
# Verify the change
$ kubectl config view --minify | grep namespace:

Deploy octavia-ingress-controller in the Kubernetes cluster

Create service account and grant permissions

For testing purpose, we grant the cluster admin role to the serviceaccount created. Save the file and proceed with apply.

serviceaccount.yaml
kind: ServiceAccount
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
  name: octavia-ingress-controller
  namespace: kube-system
---
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
  name: octavia-ingress-controller
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: ClusterRole
  name: cluster-admin
subjects:
  - kind: ServiceAccount
    name: octavia-ingress-controller
    namespace: kube-system

Prepare octavia-ingress-controller configuration

As announced in the introduction, the octavia-ingress-controller needs to communicate with OpenStack cloud to create resources corresponding to the Kubernetes Ingress Resource, so the credentials of an OpenStack user (doesn't need to be the admin user) need to be provided in openstack section. Additionally, in order to differentiate the Ingresses between kubernetes clusters, cluster-name needs to be unique. Once you have filled in the fields appropriately (see below how), run the apply here too.

config.yaml
kind: ConfigMap
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
  name: octavia-ingress-controller-config
  namespace: kube-system
data:
  config: |
    cluster-name: <cluster_name>
    openstack:
      # domain-name: <domain_name>	# Choose between domain-name or domain-id (do not use together)
      domain-id: <domain_id>
      username: <username>
      # user-id: <user_id>			# Choose between user-id or username (do not use together)
      password: <password>
      project-id: <project_id>
	  auth-url: <auth_url>
      region: <region>
    octavia:
      subnet-id: <subnet_id>
      floating-network-id: <public_net_id>
      manage-security-groups: <boolean_value> # If true, creates automatically SecurityGroup

Advice

It's advisable to create a service account associated to your project, if it is shared with other users, and use the credentials of this account. To get a service account you need to ask the Cloud@CNAF administrators. However, for testing purposes, for the moment you can use your personal credentials (username/password).

Let's see how to fill the placeholders in the configuration file, going to retrieve the information from the Horizon dashboard:

  • domain-name, domain-id, username, user-id, password: all this information (except the password) can be found in the Identity/Users tab, by selecting the desired user.
  • project-id, auth-url: go to the Project/API Access tab and click the button View Credentials.
  • region: the region is present at the top left, next to the OpenStack logo.
  • subnet-id, floating-network-id: go to the Project/Network/Networks tab. Retrieve the ID of the public network and the sub-network (be careful not to get confused with the network ID).
  • manage-security-group: for the moment we insert false (default value). Later we will explain what this key is for.

Deploy octavia-ingress-controller

Info: StatefulSet vs Deployment

StatefulSet is the workload API object used to manage stateful applications. Like a Deployment (preferred in stateless applications), a StatefulSet manages Pods that are based on an identical container spec. Unlike a Deployment, a StatefulSet maintains a sticky identity for each of their Pods. These pods are created from the same spec, but are not interchangeable: each has a persistent identifier that it maintains across any rescheduling. If you want to use storage volumes to provide persistence for your workload, you can use a StatefulSet as part of the solution. Although individual Pods in a StatefulSet are susceptible to failure, the persistent Pod identifiers make it easier to match existing volumes to the new Pods that replace any that have failed.

We will deploy octavia-ingress-controller as a StatefulSet (with only one pod), due to the presence of shared volumes. Apply the .yaml file and wait until the Pod is up and running.

deployment.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
  name: octavia-ingress-controller
  namespace: kube-system
  labels:
    k8s-app: octavia-ingress-controller
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      k8s-app: octavia-ingress-controller
  serviceName: octavia-ingress-controller
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        k8s-app: octavia-ingress-controller
    spec:
      serviceAccountName: octavia-ingress-controller
      tolerations:
        - effect: NoSchedule # Make sure the pod can be scheduled on master kubelet.
          operator: Exists
        - key: CriticalAddonsOnly # Mark the pod as a critical add-on for rescheduling.
          operator: Exists
        - effect: NoExecute
          operator: Exists
      containers:
        - name: octavia-ingress-controller
          image: docker.io/k8scloudprovider/octavia-ingress-controller:latest
          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
          args:
            - /bin/octavia-ingress-controller
            - --config=/etc/config/octavia-ingress-controller-config.yaml
          volumeMounts:
            - mountPath: /etc/kubernetes
              name: kubernetes-config
              readOnly: true
            - name: ingress-config
              mountPath: /etc/config
      hostNetwork: true
      volumes:
        - name: kubernetes-config
          hostPath:
            path: /etc/kubernetes
            type: Directory
        - name: ingress-config
          configMap:
            name: octavia-ingress-controller-config
            items:
              - key: config
                path: octavia-ingress-controller-config.yaml

If the Pod does not assume the desired state, investigate the problem with (according to the StatefulSet naming convention, the Pods will be named <name>-0, <name>-1, <name>-2, etc., depending on the number of replicas)

Get more details
$ kubectl describe pod/octavia-ingress-controller-0
$ kubectl logs pod/octavia-ingress-controller-0

Setting up HTTP Load Balancing with Ingress

Create a backend service

Create a simple web services (of type NodePort), analogous to those encountered in the previous chapter. When you create a Service of type NodePort, Kubernetes makes your Service available on a randomly selected high port number (in the range 30000-32767) on all the nodes in your cluster.

Example deployment
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: coffee
spec:
  replicas: 2
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: coffee
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: coffee
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: coffee
        image: nginxdemos/nginx-hello:plain-text
        ports:
        - containerPort: 8080
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: coffee-svc
  labels:
    app: coffee
spec:
  ports:
  - port: 80
    targetPort: 8080
    protocol: TCP
    name: http
  selector:
    app: coffee
  type: NodePort	# <--- Pay attention
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: tea
spec:
  replicas: 3
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: tea
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: tea
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: tea
        image: nginxdemos/nginx-hello:plain-text
        ports:
        - containerPort: 8080
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: tea-svc
  labels:
    app: tea
spec:
  ports:
  - port: 80
    targetPort: 8080
    protocol: TCP
    name: http
  selector:
    app: tea
  type: NodePort	# <--- Pay attention

For a quick check, we can contact, for example with a curl, the services at the address in the CLUSTER-IP column. Note the system-generated values for the NodePorts of the two services (in this case 31156 and 30458).

Verify Service
$ kubectl get svc
NAME         TYPE        CLUSTER-IP      EXTERNAL-IP   PORT(S)        AGE
coffee-svc   NodePort    10.110.66.194   <none>        80:31156/TCP   3d1h
tea-svc      NodePort    10.96.32.111    <none>        80:30458/TCP   3d1h
# Verify that the service is working
$ curl 10.110.66.194
Server address: 172.16.231.221:8080
Server name: coffee-6f4b79b975-v7cv2
Date: 30/Oct/2020:16:33:20 +0000
URI: /
Request ID: 8d870888961431bf04dd2305d614004f

Create an Ingress Resource

Now we create an Ingress Resource, to make your HTTP web server application publicly accessible. The following lines defines an Ingress Resource that forwards traffic that requests http://webserver-bar.com to the webserver

Configure Ingress resource
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
  name: lb
  annotations:
    kubernetes.io/ingress.class: "openstack"
    octavia.ingress.kubernetes.io/internal: "false"	# Set true, if you don't want your Ingress to be accessible from the public internet
spec:
  rules:
  - host: webserver-bar.com
    http:
      paths:
      - path: /tea				# Use webserver-bar.com/tea to target "tea" services
        pathType: Prefix		# This field is mandatory. Other values are "ImplementationSpecific" and "Exact"
        backend:
          service:
            name: tea-svc		# Enter the service name
            port:
              number: 80		# Enter the port number on which the service is listening
      - path: /coffee			# Use webserver-bar.com/coffee to target "coffee" services
        pathType: Prefix		# This field is mandatory. Other values are "ImplementationSpecific" and "Exact"
        backend:
          service:
            name: coffee-svc	# Enter the service name
            port:
              number: 80		# Enter the port number on which the service is listening

Ingress and dashboard namespace

The application and the Ingress Resource must belong to the same namespace, otherwise the latter will not be able to "see" the backend service. If, on the other hand, you are feeling brave, you can experiment by implementing services of type ExternalName (reference).

Apply it and verify that Ingress Resource has been created. Please note that the IP address will not be defined right away (wait for the ADDRESS field to get populated). It is possible to follow the implementation of the LB step by step, from the creation of its components (Listener, Pool, Policy) to the assignment of the FIP, from the log of the Pod of the Ingress Controller (the whole operation can take a few minutes).

Ingress Resource
$ kubectl get ing
NAME   CLASS    HOSTS               ADDRESS          PORTS   AGE
lb     <none>   webserver-bar.com   131.154.97.200   80      3d1h

Using a browser or the curl command, you should be able to access the backend service by sending HTTP request to the domain name specified in the Ingress Resource (remember to hook the hostname to the FIP in the /etc/hosts of the machine from which the request to the service starts)

Connect to the service
$ curl webserver-bar.com/coffee
Server address: 172.16.94.81:8080
Server name: coffee-6f4b79b975-25jrn
Date: 30/Oct/2020:17:34:39 +0000
URI: /coffee
Request ID: 448271f01b708f4bb1d92b31600be368

$ curl webserver-bar.com/tea
Server address: 172.16.141.44:8080
Server name: tea-6fb46d899f-47rtv
Date: 30/Oct/2020:17:34:46 +0000
URI: /tea
Request ID: 47f120d482f1236c4f5351b114d389a5

Let's move to OpenStack

Go to OpenStack and check that the LB has been created in the Project/Network/LoadBalancer tab. We navigate the LB to verify that its internal components were created and, in particular, how they were created. Let's analyze, by way of example, the L7 Rule that was automatically generated to reach the webserver-bar.com/tea address. Here we can get a taste of the convenience of using this approach. In addition to building and automatically configuring the components that make up the LB, this also generates the Policies and Rule on the basis of what is written in the configuration file of the Ingress Resource. This help is more appreciable the more complex the structure of your web server is.

L7Rule

A speech remained pending. I'm talking about the ConfigMap manage-security-groups key. If set to true, a new group would appear in the Project/Network/SecurityGroups tab, containing the NodePorts of the implemented services (in this case the ports 31156 and 30458 of the coffee and tea services). In this way, the group can be associated with cluster instances. Why did I recommend setting the value to false? Because it would be useless, since the ports are already open. In fact, when installing Kubeadm (see "Preliminary steps" in cap. 2), it is recommended to open the range of ports 30000-32767 for WorkerNodes, which corresponds to the range in which a NodePort can be generated.

  • No labels